Entre o sonho e a realidade: legado do programa de fomento - PBSM, no RS

Abstract

This study sought to identify the program's legacy of Promoting the Rural productive activities while PBSM to component that it proposes and the reality of families involved, from your execution context in RS between 2012 and 2014. Sought to respond to questions about the capacity of this public policy complementary to the Family allowance program (door), in driving the families involved to overcome the condition of extreme rural poverty. For its realization rescued if the existing theoretical synthesis about the phenomenon of poverty, its causes and taking into account the aggravation of your naturalization which helps to understand the invisibility, indifference and prejudice directed at populations excluded in Brazil, so uneven that if equal says. Taking as reference, the Diagnostics prepared with families who have joined the program it was possible to meet the face of the extreme rural poverty in RS. With the foot in this complex reality and with reference to the interpretive approach to public policy analysis identified the perception of the professionals involved in implementing the program as well as the results of the evaluation conducted by the executing agency. As the final step of the survey interviewed families and social subjects who participated directly or indirectly from the program in one of the poorest municipalities in the State. Because of this study identified that the program has reached those most excluded from rural families Gaucho, supporting them in their productive projects and the expansion of its assets that positively affected the food security of families with income generation as possible in each reality. Additionally focused positively on women's autonomy, sociability, and relations of these families and in the expansion of citizenship, not that necessary, that possible in the face of centuries of exclusion. When draft scope of this limits public policy front to manifest dreams of these families, you have to consider your achievements in just two years of implementation and its potential before qualifying the demand continuity and universalization in perspective of socio-political signs in dispute for overcoming the structural causes of poverty or not.