A imanência como fundamento da Transcendência: a questão do ser em Michel Henry e MartinN Heidegger

Abstract

Michel Henry seeks a new phenomenological beginning for ontology from the translation of Being Heideggerian, entering a new and profound sense of the immanence of the ego. To do so, he states that the Heideggerian ontology starts from an indeterminate manifestation of the phenomenology of Being. The present study describes the general lines of this project and is divided into three parts. In the first part, we start with a succinct presentation of Husserl's phenomenology, describing its phenomenological bases, namely: the method of reduction and the description of the experiences of the intentionality of consciousness. With this we want Heidegger's ontology, which will be described from the second part of the study, from the method of existential analysis of Dasein. Still in the second part, we present Michel Henry's critique of the primacy of transcendence in Heidegger's analysis. The French author states that the Heideggerian beginning of Being, before beginning to appear of Being, begins with the appearance of beings in its transcendent horizon. Such a method, according to Henry, is based on a basic phenomenological indeterminacy, which does not reveal Being to us in its appearance, but in its manifestation in beings. In the third and final part, central to the present study, we present a phenomenological proposal by Henry to think about the foundation of ontology, from then on, of the appearing of Being. This presentation is exposed from Henry's reading of the Cartesian cogito, which reveals in his discovery the meaning of the Self's appearing; No need for mediation by the entity. The Being is shown in the Videor, an original feeling that the cogito experiences immediately. He, the Videor, is a radical experience of Being in the radical immanence of the ego, and only he will be able to give the possibility of the manifestation of transcendence. Doing so, the essence of conformity. The thesis we defend is that in Michel Henry's phenomenology, immanence is the essence of transcendence. It does this without the need for an entity and realizes the horizon of the sense of the phenomenalization of the phenomenality of the phenomenon.