Comparison of Control Techniques Applied to Photovoltaic Boost Converters
| dc.creator | Figueira, Henrique Horst | |
| dc.creator | Michels, Leandro | |
| dc.creator | Basquera Júnior, Mauro Fernando | |
| dc.creator | Bellinaso, Lucas Vizzotto | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-21T19:36:53Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-21T19:36:53Z | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2018-10-24 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/30622 | |
| dc.language | eng | por |
| dc.relation.ispartof | 11th Seminar on Power Electronics and Control (SEPOC 2018) | por |
| dc.rights | Acesso Aberto | por |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
| dc.subject | Photovoltaic power systems | eng |
| dc.subject | Boost converter | eng |
| dc.subject | Digital control | eng |
| dc.subject | Maximum Power Point Tracking | eng |
| dc.title | Comparison of Control Techniques Applied to Photovoltaic Boost Converters | por |
| dc.type | Trabalho Publicado em Evento | por |
| dc.description.resumo | Grid-tie photovoltaic (PV) inverters are usually composed of two conversion stages: a dc-dc boost converter and a dc-ac converter. The dc-dc boost converter is mainly responsible for extracting the maximum power from the photovoltaic array. Several control strategies have been proposed in the literature for controlling the dc-dc boost converter. However, PV systems have characteristics that impact on transient and steady state response because its small signal model is irradiance-dependent and its dc bus has oscillations (120Hz) due to inverter modulation. Thus in order to contribute to this field and support control designers, this manuscript compares three control strategies applied to PV boost converters: a simple perturbation and observation (P&O) maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithm controlling directly the duty cycle; a MPPT algorithm associated with a voltage controller; and a MPPT algorithm with cascaded voltage and current control. Experimental results are presented for comparison. Results show the third strategy (MPPT with cascade control) provides the best results for most comparison criteria. | por |
| dc.publisher.country | Brasil | por |
| dc.subject.cnpq | CNPQ::ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA ELETRICA | por |
Arquivos deste item
Este item aparece na(s) seguinte(s) coleção(s)
-
Proceedings of the 11th Seminar on Power Electronics and Control (SEPOC 2018) [106]
The 11th Seminar on Power Electronics and Control took place in Santa Maria, RS, from 21 to 24 October, 2018. The seminar’s objective was to provide interaction among academia and industry to discuss the latest cutting-edge technologies on Power Electronics, Control, Electrical Power Systems and their applications.
General Chair: Prof. Dr Marco Antonio Dalla Costa
Technical Chair: Prof. Dr. Álysson Raniere Seidel
Responsible for the repository: Prof. Lucas Vizzotto Bellinaso
Exceto quando indicado o contrário, a licença deste item é descrito como Acesso Aberto