Justiçaverso em imersão: análise sobre os possíveis usos da realidade aumentada e realidade virtual no processo judicial brasileiro

Abstract

The boundary between reality and virtuality in the contemporary technological context poses a notably complex issue. Artificial devices, network interconnections, and recreated interactions in simulated environments are deeply intertwined with human communication flows, creating a subtle and challenging barrier between these two domains. Within the scope of the judiciary, an increasingly technology-dependent sector, there emerges the need to assess its adaptation to these simulated realities, namely virtual reality and augmented reality. This study aims to examine the feasibility of applying virtual reality and augmented reality technologies in the Brazilian judicial system. The intent is to explore the development of these technologies in various areas and analyze the possibility of adapting them to enhance the judicial process in Brazil. The central problem lies in the adoption of these technological innovations in the legal context, considering their effectiveness in other fields. The hypothesis maintains that the incorporation of these tools can optimize judicial procedures, making them more precise and objective. The research seeks to contextualize the progress of these technologies, understand their impact in different areas, trace their technological evolution, and explore how they can be employed in the judicial system. Hypothetico deductive and monographic methods, supported by documentary research techniques, focusing on bibliographic sources and public documents, are utilized. The monographic analysis deepens the understanding of these technologies but also emphasizes the need for an adaptable and ethical approach to their implementation. Therefore, the study aims to explore the potential of mixed realities in the Brazilian judicial system, highlighting their applicability in forensic investigations, trials, and conciliations. Despite the benefits, reservations exist, including challenges of access and concerns regarding security and ethics. It is concluded that the careful implementation of these technologies can strengthen the judicial system, promoting efficiency and inclusion, provided critical issues are addressed in an ethical and transparent manner