Os novíssimos movimentos sociais e a sociedade em rede: a criminalização das Jornadas de junho de 2013 e a consolidação de um Estado delinquente

Abstract

Social movements demonstrate a clear popular resistance mechanism, and it´s possible to see them in the course of history. To understand its many facets, it was necessary to establish a dichotomy between old and new social movements, inquiring, from this, the characteristics of the brand new social movements in order to interpret the June Conference and its aspects, especially with regard to the emergence of the internet and their imbrications. Thus, it´s essential to understand that this view is only feasible by verifying that the alluded movements materialized a constitutional principle and all normative force deriving from it. In this sense, it fell to assert that the criminalization of these social movements violates the constitutional principle of free expression of thought. So, to answer the posted research problem, it was chosen the deductive method of approach, and, as to the basis theory, was elected the Manuel Castells s Informational Society Communication Theory and Alessandro Baratta s Critical Criminology. Regarding the procedure methods it was adopted the historical, the monographic and the comparative. In order to organize the study, it was necessary to divide the work into three chapters. The first one started from the constitutional right of free expression of thought, studying the deontological importance of a democratically adopted principle being established, after this, the division between "old and new social movements to the brand new social movements. In the second chapter, the study was guided strictly in the social movements that have invaded the network and the streets in 2013 in Brazil. Finally, in the third chapter, researched from the critical criminology, interpretation of the state's attitude towards these movements and the criminalization perpetrated. Based on these analyzes, it was found the presence of stiffening criminal ideologies and the consolidation of a delinquent State, opposite the undeniable violation of a constitutional provision. So it was guided to understand that the criminalization of social movements is a legal contradiction that undermines the Constitution and mitigates democracy that intends to consolidate.